Hi Piotr,
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 14:33:39 +0200, Piotr O??arowski <pi...@debian.org> wrote: > [Toni Mueller, 2010-05-08] > > On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 10:55:40 +0200, Piotr O??arowski <pi...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > [anatoly techtonik, 2010-05-08] > > > > Why not use virtualenv for Packaging applications? > > > > > > Every single DD understands that shipping two copies of the same file is > > > one too many. > > > > actually, I don't. > > you want to use virtualenv in Debian packages? Seriously? Let me know > when you plan to tell that to security team, I'll prapare some > popcorn... ;-) no, I don't want to use it in Debian packages, but need to use it when I cannot use Debian packages, which is very often the case. But it *will* lead to having more than one instance of a given file on the system, eg. one copy of setuptools per virtualenv. > > Virtualenv has been a life-saver for me more than once, > Virtualenv is great and I wish every admin would use it instead of > messing in /usr, agreed. Me too. Kind regards, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100508125046.16241.qm...@oak.oeko.net
