Hi Jakub (2010.05.17_20:01:25_+0200) > 19 packages uses syntax constructs specific to Python 2.5+ in their > public modules but don't declare that minimum supported version is 2.5. > I'm looking for volunteers to do MBF.
Done, only 13 real bugs. calibre_0.5.14+dfsg-1 False positive elyxer_0.98-1 Fixed in 0.98-2 epigrass_2.0.1~dfsg-1 False positive idjc_0.8.2-2 False positive moovida-plugins-bad_1.0.9+bzr1614-1 Existing bug: http://bugs.debian.org/572188 python-apptools_3.3.1-1 False positive python-django-treebeard_1.60-3 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582045 python-docky_2.0.3.1-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582046 python-envisageplugins_3.1.2-1 False positive python-lamson_1.0pre11-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582047 python-netio230a_1.0.1-2 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582048 python-paver_1.0.2-1 Existing bug: http://bugs.debian.org/575186 python-pesto_16-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582050 python-pydhcplib_0.6.2-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582051 python-tegaki-gtk_0.3.1-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582052 python-tegaki_0.3.1-1 Existing bug: http://bugs.debian.org/577096 python-traitsbackendqt_3.3.0-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582054 python-traitsbackendwx_3.3.0-1 False positive pytrainer_1.7.2-1 Filed http://bugs.debian.org/582056 All the bugs were just errors thrown in the python-support hook, except for python-traitsbackendqt (Bug #582054) which was an install failure. I've usertagged them all python2.4-incompatible. A possibly cause for these issues is Bug #582061 where the python-support documentation isn't as clear as it could be about specifying python-version compatibility. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100518001453.gj20...@bach