On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >[Barry Warsaw, 2011-07-27] >> Another question about the intent of dh_python2, this time as it relates to >> private packages. >> >> So, I'm converting ibus-table, which installs some .py files into >> /usr/share/ibus-table/engine. I've been playing with different incantations >> of the binary-indep rule: >> >> ... >> dh_python2 >> dh_python2 /usr/share/ibus-table/engine >> >> which is what we're currently recommending people on the transitions page. >> If >> I look at the resulting usr/share/python/runtime.d/ibus-table.rtupdate, I see >> two sections: >> >> -----snip snip----- >> #! /bin/sh >> set -e >> if [ "$1" = rtupdate ]; then >> pyclean /usr/share/ibus-table >> pycompile /usr/share/ibus-table >> fi >> if [ "$1" = rtupdate ]; then >> pyclean /usr/share/ibus-table/engine >> pycompile /usr/share/ibus-table/engine >> fi >> -----snip snip----- >> >> Now, there's nothing wrong with this, but the first stanza is unnecessary. >> The only .py files laid down by the package are in >> /usr/share/ibus-table/engine, so only the second stanza does anything useful. >> The first doesn't hurt but it's unnecessary, afaict. > >doesn't dh_python2 alone do the right thing?
I think not. With just
dh_python2
I get the first stanza but not the second one.
>Do you really need
>`dh_python2 /usr/share/ibus-table/engine`? If you do, then I need to
>change pyclean/pycompile a bit (and add support for "-p" and dir
>argument at the same time)
That would probably work.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
