On 14 March 2012 04:13, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> I did have to make some additional changes, such as using a policy > compliant > binary name in python3, as we did for PyQt4 (python3-pyqt4.qsci) and using > dh_sip3 for the python3 package. You can see the details in the DPMT SVN > if > you want. > I've been and looked, and it mostly makes sense to me. A couple of questions: Is the policy for binary package names simply to use python3- followed by the lowercased name that you'd import? You changed the packaging to build for all supported Python 3 versions, rather than only the default (although I think only 3.2 is currently supported, anyway). I'd originally had it like that, but when I looked at the PyQt4 packaging, it was only targeting the default version (py3versions -vd), so I followed suit for qscintilla. How do we decide which option to use? Thanks, Thomas
