Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> writes: > * Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk>, 2012-03-24, 12:29: > >> "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" would be more > >> friendly to backporters. > > Done. Note this is what the file created by dh_make has (although that > > could have been updated in a newer version than I have). > > I don't accept "it's dh_make's fault!" excuses, sorry. :P
Thomas wasn't offering an excuse, AFAICT; he accepted the request to change the field and did what was asked, so isn't asking to be excused. Rather, what Thomas says above reads to me as an explanation and a warning of an attractive nuisance: “note that, unless this is changed in ‘dh_make’, it will tend to happen in other new packages”. -- \ “Remember: every member of your ‘target audience’ also owns a | `\ broadcasting station. These ‘targets’ can shoot back.” —Michael | _o__) Rathbun to advertisers, news.admin.net-abuse.email | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87398xjz4z....@benfinney.id.au
