Am 20.02.2013 00:53, schrieb Piotr Ożarowski: > [Barry Warsaw, 2013-02-19] >> So I still think it comes down to, them that does the work gets to >> decide, but there *is* work to do. It's clear we don't want multiple >> vcses. So I think you have an opportunity to convince us by: >> >> * Doing a test migration and putting a test repo up so we can play with >> it and see what it's like. >> >> * Figure out whether full-source or debian/ only works better (maybe give >> us both repos so we can play with them and discuss the pros and cons >> from actual working examples). >> >> * Put together draft policy and documentation to describe a workflow for >> team maintenance of packages under git, including branching, pull >> requests, code review, quilt integration, package building, etc. >> >> * Work out how upstreams that are under other vcses would work. >> >> * Provide a plan for a smooth flag day transition if/when consensus is >> reached. >> >> * Gather feedback, fix problems, rinse and repeat. >> >> Once people are comfortable with how a git-based team repository would >> work, I suspect you'll find more consensus to switch. > > +1
can we limit the packages in this ppa to those using dh_python[23] and those supporting python3? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/512416b2.5030...@debian.org
