Thanks for the heads up!

I've checked reverse build-dependencies in sid only, in experimental
there are more matching packages, but only pyxdg needs fixing.
Surprisingly, many packages are already using the right way.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk> wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 06:28, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> After looking at all packages that build-depend on python3-nose, I've
>> identified these packages as needing fix:
>
>
> I happen to recall that python-xdg is also affected, both in debian/rules
> [1] and autopkgtests [2].
>
> I'm happy to update that, but you might want to double check the script that
> you were using to scan packages, to make sure that we're not missing other
> cases.
>
> [1]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/pyxdg/trunk/debian/rules?revision=22479&view=markup
> [2]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/pyxdg/trunk/debian/tests/upstream?revision=23091&view=markup
>
> Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAKimPHVhz3HMH4rMoOnAn_SVEcEiCYN4oO9xi4ckiCFi=zw...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to