On 04/14/2013 03:10 AM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Am 13.04.2013 05:46, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: >> On 02/21/2013 03:34 PM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: >>> Am 21.02.2013 20:42, schrieb Jakub Wilk: >>>> * Cornelius Kölbel <cornelius.koel...@lsexperts.de>, 2013-02-21, 20:14: >>>>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrcode/qrcode_2.4.2-1.dsc >>>>> Great. The mentors site suddenly gives me lintian warnings, that were >>>>> not there earlier and that did give the linitan on my debian >>>>> experimental. :-( >>>> There's only one lintian warning: >>>> >>>> W: qrcode source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (>= >>>> 7.0.50~) >>>> >>>> This tag was been retired in Lintian 2.5.11, because stable has a >>>> newer debhelper version, and oldstable is not supported anymore. (I >>>> would have preferred if the tag was made pedantic rather than removed, >>>> but oh well...) >>>> >>>> The remaining tags are informative: >>>> >>>> I: qrcode source: quilt-patch-missing-description add-man-page >>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:7 >>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:13 >>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:19 >>>> >>> Anyway. >>> ...and again I upload a hopefully again nicer version. >>> I hope the next package will be less complicated... >> I'm interesting in sponsoring this package and uploading it, if no one else >> has claimed it. Cornelius, do you have a git or svn repo for this package >> yet? If not, I can set up a git repo on collab-maint. >> >> .hc >> > Hello Hans-Christoph, > > to my knowledge till now noone has claimed the package. > So I would very much appreciate, if you would sponsor this package. > > There is the git repo of the upstream package, which is located here: > > https://github.com/lincolnloop/python-qrcode > > As part of an internal git I have my addons (Makefile to download, patch > and build the package) in this repository. > So if this should be in a public git, we should move it there, yes, thanks! > > There is one thing for me to do: > The upstream was updated to 2.5.1, and I would have to build a new > package from this. > > Thanks a lot and kind regards > Cornelius
There is a new style of organizing git repos for packages that have upstream git repos that I want to try. It allows you to have the upstream history, the tarball/release history, and the debian packaging history all in one repo, all while being easily buildable using git-buildpackage. http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2013-04/001.html <http://www.eyrie.org/%7Eeagle/journal/2013-04/001.html> So if you don't mind, I'd like to merge in the commits from your git into a new repo that I build up. .hc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
