Hi, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 09:12:45PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>, 2014-04-25, 16:08: > >[Debian Python Modules Team > ><python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org> in CC since it > >maintains python-reportlab] > > ITYM s/maintains/is in Uploaders of/. It makes a big difference here...
Does this mean that not any member of the team could upload a fixed package? That would be strange regarding my experience with packaging teams. > >>Well, this was rather me forgetting a python-imaging dependency > >>- I (wrongly) assumed that python-pil would be sufficient. > > Note that python-imaging is only a compatibility package. It would > be better to port biopython to the new PIL API. Well, I have no idea what "porting" really means. If there might be a simple patch that would be OK. Otherwise I can only hope for upstream. > >Unfortunately the result remained the same. I somehow came to the > >conclusion that the problem is caused by a broken reportlab > >package > > I came to the same conclusion. I've attached what seems to be a > minimal test-case: > ... > If I understand correctly, reportlab is trying to use non-free Adobe > PostScript fonts, which (unsurprisingly) doesn't work on Debian > systems. It should use the substitutes from the gsfonts package > instead. As I just reported to #745985 your patch works nicely. Many thanks for it. It would be great if there would be an upload of this fix in a short timeframe. Many thanks Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140428111141.gk8...@an3as.eu