On Aug 02, 2014, at 06:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >If someone on the team is interested in this package staying in Debian and >willing to be added to uploaders, please speak up. I don't mind doing the >work to modernize the packaging, but don't care to be responsible for it long >term.
I personally don't think it's worth spending time on gnupginterface. We have the PyPI package python-gnupg in the archive and its upstream seems relatively active. I don't think we have gnupg 1.3.1 (top PyPI hit for "gnupg") and that has an even more recent PyPI release. I haven't looked at the latter, but I use the former in several projects, including Python 3 projects. I think we should drop gnupginterface. Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140803110630.7cb08...@anarchist.wooz.org
