On Aug 05, 2014, at 04:09 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >I think it is a good practice to make the source package name the same as the >binary package name as long is there isn't a good reason to do otherwise. So >with any source package that produces one binary package, those names should >match. That keeps the Debian namespace smaller and more easy to understand. > >If a source package produces more than one binary package, then I think it >makes the most sense to name the source package using the upstream name, >barring name conflicts, too general a name, etc.
In the context of Python libraries, please try to be pro-active, especially if you know that the upstream is or will be supporting both Python 2 and 3. plan-for-success-ly y'rs, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140805161421.1728f...@anarchist.wooz.org
