Hi Donald (2015.02.04_22:06:25_+0200) > > On 4 February 2015 at 06:08, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > >> If it gets implemented it'll live at /uscan/ because it exists primarily to > >> work around the deficiencies that exist in uscan (Particularly the > >> dificulty > >> in ignoring url fragments).
Would it be that hard to have fake directory listings on /simple/? I mean, surely keeping compatibility there is simpler than having a second endpoint just for Debian. > We talked about this in #debian-python and there was concern that a new > version > of uscan wouldn’t be in Jessie and then wouldn’t cover the people who need it > the most. Who needs it the most? We could fix it in unstable and backports. The DEHS data on tracker.debian.org comes from quantz.debian.org. which is currently using devscripts from backports. > I don’t know if that’s true or not but I certainly think that uscan _should_ > ignore anything that comes after a # (similarly to how it ignores anything > that > comes after a ?). Agreed. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150204213208.ga3...@bach.rivera.co.za
