Hi Paul (2015.04.15_16:53:04_+0200) > > See ‘git-buildpackage(1)’, the ‘--git-overlay’ option. > > > > Is that still a wholly compatible workflow with what is being proposed? > > I have this workflow as well, and this would even work really well with > our current svn repos, but folks in the room at DebConf and at our > hangout today disagreed it was good. The universal disbelief about this > approach leads me to think I'm in the minority and have kinda just went > along with the flow.
I'm in your corner, on this. Maintaining /debian/ in git separately, is conceptually cleaner (and friendlier to the small laptop SSD). But I've given this up as an un-winnable battle. The tools for this workflow aren't as good as full source, and full source is actually kind of nice to work on. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150415145844.gb3...@bach.rivera.co.za
