On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:58:07 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 20 July 2015 at 09:00, Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:56:55 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > > >> [Julien Cristau, 2015-07-20] > >> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 21:28:32 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > >> > > >> > > Should we patch distutils/setuptools to not generate them? It generates > >> > > them even for Python 3.X (which has PEP420 implemented) > >> > > >> > Please don't. Using an pkg_resources-style vs PEP420 namespace should > >> > be an upstream decision made individually for each namespace. > >> > >> dh_py* tools then > > > > No, since that would break sharing a namespace with parts installed > > as a debian package and parts using the normal python tools. > > And why should debian-python support that? > Is that a serious question? Why should debian-python, for no good reason, break things that work just fine?
Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr> Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150720111214.gc1...@sh76.dev.logilab.fr
