On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it >>> because there's no reverse dependency for it. >> >> Thanks for packaging it :) >> >>> If you want to continue maintaining it within the OpenStack PKG team, >>> you can do it as well. Though we're not using git-dpm, and rather a git >>> tag workflow, you're still free to use whatever workflow you want there, >>> as long as the package is well maintained. >>> >>> If you need sponsoring for this package, I can review it and upload it >>> for you. >> >> Great, thanks for the offer. I think I'll have to wait a couple of weeks >> to see where things are for packaging this. There is at least one new >> dependency for the latest release (python-fake-factory), I have packaged >> that, but the tests currently don't pass. Once there is a release for >> python-fake-factory, for which the tests pass, and that has been >> uploaded to Debian, I'll get around to looking at factory-boy again. > > Its been quite a few weeks, but the above is now done. The missing > dependency (python-fake-factory) is now in Debian, and I have updated > factory-boy to the latest upstream version [1]. > > Are you still open to sponsoring this zigo? I have just filled in the > alioth form to become a member of the OpenStack team. > > 1: http://git.cbaines.net/factory-boy/
Hi, I added you as a member of the team. Let me know when I should sponsor the package. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)