On 13 July 2017 at 11:46, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com > wrote:
> On 10 July 2017 at 21:52, Tristan Seligmann <mithra...@mithrandi.net> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 11:45 Michael Hudson-Doyle < >> michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about >>> why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3. >>> >> >> Sounds reasonable to me! >> > > So a wrinkle here is that trollius-redis was packaged as it is a > dependency of pagure. Pagure is currently Python 2 only so removing > python3-trollius and python3-trollius-redis will not impede that effort in > the short term, but it might make life harder as and when pagure does > switch to Python 3. Of course, we could make the (reasonable sounding) bet > that if pagure switches to Python 3, it will also switch to asyncio rather > than depending on the deprecated trollius. > > What do you think? Having written the above out, I think it still makes > sense to proceed with my plan. I'll start filing bugs and patches and > looking for sponsors... > The bugs and patches are all at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=no-more-python3-trollius;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org if someone wants to get their sponsoring boots on :) Cheers, mwh
