Le mardi 13 mars 2018 à 09:18 +0100, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > On 03/13/2018 12:29 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Imo, we should just make it clear in policy that source packages > > should be named `foo` or `python-foo`, > > and corresponding doc packages should be named `foo-doc` or > > `python-foo-doc`. > > Very often, "foo" is already taken by another package, and we have to > fallback to python-foo. Think about generic libs for compression, > images, network standards...
Agreed. > Which is why I think we should have standardize on python-foo for the > source package (which is what I do). Same here. Do you think we should be recommending the use of `python-foo` in the DPMT packaging policy? This could help avoiding ITPs for `python3-bar`. Ghis