Le lun. 9 avr. 2018 à 08:46, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> a écrit :
> Hi, > > I realised that upstream of tifffile[1] switched to Python3. When > inspecting the package I somehow think that its main purpose is rather a > user application than a Python module and thus I would rather rename the > binary from python-tifffile to tifffile than python3-tifffile. What do > you think? > > As per [2] I added dh-python to the Build-Depends but it seems I would > need python-minimal in addition to get /usr/bin/pyversions. For me it > is a bit strange to realise that this basic functionality is not provided > by dh-python "Depends: python-minimal". Am I missing something? > > It also seems that a Build-Depends: python3-distutils and if I add it it > tries to do "python setup.py clean -a" which is stupid since there is no > setup.py (and also no python but only python3). I wonder whether I'm > missing something here as well in this very simple package which does > not seem to work well with dh-python. > > BTW, I'd be *really* happy if somebody from Python team would take over > this package into Python packaging team. I just adopted it from a > former Debian Med team member but it is not Debian Med specific at all > and I have no real interest in this package. > I could have a look at it. Do you reckon why the package was needed originally? I am surprised it landed in d-med, so perhaps there is another package needing it? > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list. > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/tifffile > [2] https://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist > > -- > http://fam-tille.d <http://fam-tille.de>e > Cheers, Ghis >
