Hey, On 09/11/19 2:42 am, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 19-11-08 16 h 01, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi intri! >> >> I'm very glad to count you as a member of the team! Welcome. [1] >> I'd be glad if more perl team members join, it's so much always a >> pleasure to meet you at each debconf. >> >> On 11/8/19 8:54 AM, intrigeri wrote: >>> - In https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin, >>> the "Policy About Maintainer and Uploaders Fields" section >>> mentions an "unwritten policy". Said policy seems to have been >>> written since: >>> >>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst >> It's probably time to revisit this policy. I've heard many voices >> telling that a package should either be in the team, or just not, and I >> very much agree with this. This middle-ground makes no sense. > We now have a proper way to propose updates to the policy [1]!
I am not sure where we stand on the following idea, but I'd like to see it float across. Something I'd like to propose is to have more *owners* than just 5 of them. Just having 5 people in the team who everyone relies on for being granted access doesn't seem like a very nice idea to me. Whilst they are doing a nice job, I feel every DD[1] should be able to grant access. I don't quite like how the access is just limited to 5 people throughout debian-python. [1]: we can come up with some other metric to bump ACL level, too, but we should *definitely* come up with something. One way forward is to add DDs as owner and every other person as a maintainer. Suggestions open. Best, Utkarsh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
