On 2021-02-12 10:16, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I mostly agree to add a metapackage. I just don't agree with the choice > of package name. It makes our user believe that Python isn't "full" > without it, and they then may install it when they don't need it to > consume whatever is packaged in Debian. Reality is different.
I agree with your technical point of view. Friends don't let friends use pip and I banned its use at work. I don't care about having the package or not and how it were named, as long as it remains easy to not have it. Cheers
