On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, what > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > Regards, > Boyuan Yang > > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517
Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and let people know they can migrate to it. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
