Hi Jan, I see on the tracker that you have both set the LowNMU flag (like I did too) and also made use of the special rule of the DPT policy discussed from [1]; that seems a bit of a contradiction to me but I have read that it was the default behaviour of some source package templating tool which might explain where it came from.
Would you agree to swap Maintainer & Uploader fields like proposed ? My offer to refresh the package still stands on. I would need this anyway for my work anyway in the coming months, that seems like a waste of time not to share this work. (we are currently using the bookworm .deb on buster and it justs works...) Greetings [0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-pika Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 22:30, Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-tille.de> a écrit : > > Hi Gudjon, > > in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the > debian-python mailing list[1] would you agree to set DPT as maintainer? > If yes, I'd volunteer to do this, fix bug #1065855 and #1060736. > > Kind regards and thanks for working on this package > Andreas. > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html