On 02/08/2024 20:14, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >> Package authors should have had plenty of time to have this information >> propagated to them and migrate. > > In general, stuff that works doesn't receive many updates.
Yes, in fact I quite like the concept of "feature-complete passive maintenance". However, it doesn't conflict with updating with upstream/language. > And thinght might be > abandoned upstream but still work fine and be used as dependencies for other > things. Covered in another email: >> If we for example need to patch 10 dead-upstream projects > > which means the maintainer is now responsible for keeping it up to date. > Including following Python upgrades and PEPs. -- Sdrager, Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
