Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Technically these are binary NMUs, but I'd rather think of them as > happening on behalf of the maintainer by some obscure magic, and that > ultimately leaves the maintainer in charge of checking the result (at > least sporadically).
That's a reasonable way to want to change things. But as I mentioned on the mailing list, it's a *change* to current practice.
