On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:27:07PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > severity 128444 serious > > thanks > > > > In practice this is serious. I'll put together a fix. > > "in practice". No. It doesn't violate policy. Maybe it should, but > it doesn't. Of course, it's fine to fix it. But there is no rule > that packages must not depend on such things.
Sometimes actually getting things working is more important than worrying about which rules they violate, and I'm volunteering to get things working. In any case, the serious severity is also for "in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release", and in this package maintainer's opinion a package that can't be built by autobuilders is unsuitable. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
