reassign 161565 python-kjbuckets thanks Matej Vela writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > gadfly now contains the modules from python-kjbuckets, so it should > > provide python-kjbuckets. > > python-kjbuckets is indeed included in the sources, but the binary > package contains only a private, pure-Python kjbuckets implementation > used if python-kjbuckets is missing (note that gadfly Recommends it). > Having been written in C, python-kjbuckets is considerably faster, and > three times smaller than gadfly. > > If you insist, I think it would be better to remove the pure-Python > code and make python-kjbuckets a dependency of gadfly.
no. because the separate python-kjbuckets source is outdated, it would be best, if you build python-kjbuckets from the gadfly source (in the existing python*-kjbuckts packages). Be prepared to get the version number for the python*-kjbuckts packages right. I am doing a NMU for python-kjbuckets now, to fix the installation problem, but I would like to see python-kjbuckets integrated into gadfly. Matthias