Your message dated Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:21:28 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Build failure of langdrill on i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 08:42:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 18 03:42:49 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 182SiX-0008LZ-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:42:49 -0500
Received: from atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id RAA25131
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:42:18 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1]
claimed to be atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:42:20 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: submit bug tracking system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of langdrill on i386
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0
tests=NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
SUPERLONG_LINE,X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: langdrill
Version: 0.2.1-6
Severity: serious
langdrill fails to build from source on i386, when doing a rebuild inside
chroot.
I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source in the current sid distribution.
It is a serious problem that your source does not
build from source using the information provided in your control files,
and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.
This build was done using pbuilder package.
Build log follows:
===========================================
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/langdrill-0.2.1/src'
rm -f langdrill core
g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
-DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
-DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
/usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -c main.cc -o main.o
g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
-DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
-DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
/usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -c config.cc -o config.o
>> langdrill compilled for Debian GNU/Linux system. <<
g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
-DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
-DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
/usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -o langdrill main.o config.o `vdk-config --libs`
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [langdrill] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/langdrill-0.2.1/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/langdrill-0.2.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
===========================================
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165294-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2002 19:21:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 22 13:21:30 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FJMn-0002ZQ-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:21:30 -0600
Received: from host217-35-41-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.41.25]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16)
id 18FJMm-00067P-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:21:29 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18FJMm-0008CL-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:21:28 +0000
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:21:28 +0000
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTBFS: Build failure of langdrill on i386
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.2 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:42:20PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Package: langdrill
> Version: 0.2.1-6
> Severity: serious
>
>
> langdrill fails to build from source on i386, when doing a rebuild inside
> chroot.
>
> I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
> package from source in the current sid distribution.
> It is a serious problem that your source does not
> build from source using the information provided in your control files,
> and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.
>
> This build was done using pbuilder package.
>
>
> Build log follows:
> ===========================================
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/langdrill-0.2.1/src'
> rm -f langdrill core
> g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
> -DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
> -DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
> /usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -c main.cc -o main.o
> g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
> -DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
> -DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
> /usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -c config.cc -o config.o
> >> langdrill compilled for Debian GNU/Linux system. <<
> g++ `vdk-config --cflags` -DTARGET='"langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC='"langdrill.rc"'
> -DTARGET_RC_LOCAL='".langdrill"' -DTARGET_RC_DIR='"/etc"'
> -DDRILL_DEF='"default.drill"' -DDRILL_DIR='"/usr/share/vdk/langdrill"' -I
> /usr/include/gnome-1.0/ -o langdrill main.o config.o `vdk-config --libs`
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
langdrill doesn't mention 'jpeg' anywhere in its source. This was a bug
in libvdk1-dev: 'vdk-config --libs' used to output '-ljpeg', but didn't
depend on it.
With libvdk1-dev 1.2.5-9, this is no longer an issue, as vdk-config no
longer tells callers to link against libjpeg. However, I've cc'ed the
maintainer of that package in case this shows up again in the future.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
