Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2002 03:39:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 08 22:39:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17oFOn-00083k-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 22:39:42 -0500
Received: from atoron (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id MAA28845
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:39:10 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] 
claimed to be atoron
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:39:16 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: submit bug tracking system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of linuxconf on i386
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: linuxconf
Version: 1.26r4-2


linuxconf fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.

I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source. It is a serious problem that your source does not 
build from source using the information provided in your control files,
and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.

This build was done using pbuilder package.



This package build-deps on libgd-dev, which depends on libpng3-dev.
This package build-deps on libpng2-dev, which is not parallel-installable.

Please switch over to png3.


regards,
        junichi


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 160172-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it.  See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg00005.html
for more information.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to