Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 02:03:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 23 20:03:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail305.mail.bellsouth.net (imf05bis.bellsouth.net) 
[205.152.58.165] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18Fm7l-0006XB-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:54 -0600
Received: from loki ([216.78.168.67]) by imf05bis.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:05:11 -0500
Received: from marenks by loki with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18Fm7F-0000Wq-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:21 -0600
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:21 -0600
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linuxconf_1.26r4-2.1(m68k/unstable/zeus): fails to build from source
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: "Stephen R. Marenka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linuxconf
Version: 1.26r4-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


linuxconf fails to build from source.

Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.


| Automatic build of linuxconf_1.26r4-2.1 on zeus by sbuild/m68k 1.170
| Build started at 20021123-0044
| ******************************************************************************

 [...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.40), libncurses5-dev, libpng3-dev, libgd-dev 
(>= 1.8.3), libdb3-dev, libpam0g-dev, libxml-dev, python-dev (>= 2.1)

 [...]

| dh_undocumented -a
| dh_installchangelogs -plinuxconf
| dh_strip -a
| strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN!
| strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN!
| dh_compress -a
| dh_fixperms -a
| dh_installdeb -a
| dh_makeshlibs -a
| dh_shlibdeps -a
| dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for liblinuxconf.so.1
| dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on 
`debian/linuxconf/usr/lib/linuxconf/lib/XFmousereset' gave error exit status 1
| dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256
| make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
| ******************************************************************************
| Build finished at 20021123-0735
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A full buildd log is available at 
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=linuxconf&ver=1.26r4-2.1&arch=m68k>

Other buildd logs may be available at 
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=linuxconf>

--
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 170483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it.  See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg00005.html
for more information.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to