Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 1997 13:12:47 +0000
Received: (qmail 4946 invoked from network); 9 Jul 1997 13:12:41 -0000
Received: from gate.topsystem.de (194.231.48.129)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 1997 13:12:36 -0000
Received: from gauss.topsystem.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.26.1.3])
by gate.topsystem.de (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA14256;
Wed, 9 Jul 1997 15:18:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by gauss.topsystem.de (8.8.6/8.8.5) id PAA32599;
Wed, 9 Jul 1997 15:10:54 +0200
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 15:10:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linuxconf: linuxconf does not know my setup
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 2.95
Package: linuxconf
Version: 1.9r22-2
When I try to use linuxconf to set up my network it doesn't realize the
setting I have already. E.g. it tells me I have no default gateway. But
route -v says:
...
default firewall.topsys 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 52 eth0
Maybe all this has to make it into a special fiel for linuxconf, but then
the postinst should do this adjustment. I think it is asked for too much if
the user has to re-configure everything.
Michael
-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3
Kernel Version: Linux gauss 2.0.30 #9 Fri Jun 13 13:47:31 CEST 1997 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages linuxconf depends on:
ldso Version: 1.9.2-3 (Provides Virtual Package libdl1)
ncurses3.0 Version: 1.9.9e-2
--- Begin /etc/init.d/rc.linuxconf (modified conffile)
Config file not present or no permissions for access
--- End /etc/init.d/rc.linuxconf
--- Begin /etc/init.d/boot.linuxconf (modified conffile)
Config file not present or no permissions for access
--- End /etc/init.d/boot.linuxconf
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 11125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg00005.html
for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
