Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line why RC?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 18:30:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 13:30:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 198lUS-0002Zt-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:30:36 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
        by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 198lUR-0003pP-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:30:36 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 198lUQ-0006XC-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:30:34 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wanpipe: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 Apr 2003 11:30:34 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 26
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wanpipe
Version: 2.1.1-2.1
Severity: normal

>From my build log:

...
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127

The source package needs at least debhelper in its
Build-Depends-Indep.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190619-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 00:37:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 19:37:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A1bBJ-0007cZ-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:37:29 -0500
Received: from host81-128-230-175.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.128.230.175] 
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
        by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
        id 1A1bBH-0001JA-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1A1bBH-0002Mc-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why RC?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:55:07PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Please remove wanpipe; it has been orphaned for a long time, doesn't
> have build-deps and is generally out of date; in #190619 the original
> maintainer said he'd request the removal but never got around to it.

This has been done now, so I'm closing this bug as no longer applicable:

=========================================================================
[Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:16 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

   wanpipe |  2.1.1-2.2 | source, i386
Closed bugs: 179392

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; orphaned, out-of-date, FTBFS.
----------------------------------------------
=========================================================================

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to