Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2002 08:51:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 13 02:51:03 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gprs1.vodafone.hu (sanctuary.grin.hu) [80.244.96.193] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18BtEe-0000vD-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:51:03 -0600
Received: from grin by sanctuary.grin.hu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18BtDP-00087q-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:49:39 +0100
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: metalog: hash protected logfiles?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: grin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:49:39 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: metalog
Version: 0.7beta-1
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

Just wondering since the author compared the program to syslog-ng: is it
planned to have cryptographically [hash] protected logs from illegal
modification? Since logrotation is done by the program itself it's maybe
even easier than for the other daemons. And so far nobody got it right,
afaik.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was
unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and
useless.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to