Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 18:49:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 13:49:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from as5800-83-102.access.naxs.com (satin.kitenet.net) 
[216.98.83.102] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17IDBV-0002bY-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:49:34 -0500
Received: from joey by satin.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 17ID9j-0000Wj-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:47:43 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cvs-conf: no documentation
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:47:43 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: cvs-conf
Version: 0.0.1-6
Severity: normal

This package is completly lacking in documentation with the exception of
the USAGE file, which does not explain how it works or how to set it up
and use it, but only the base basics of the usage of some Makefile. Very
confusingly, there are no files in the package except those in
/usr/share/doc. If you expect a user to somehow grok how this thing
works from the USAGE file and reading the Makefile, I think you just cut
your userbase in half. No, into hundredths..

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux satin 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 24 11:16:47 EDT 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages cvs-conf depends on:
ii  cvs                           1.11.2-3   Concurrent Versions System
ii  debconf                       1.1.10     Debian configuration management sy
ii  diff                          2.7-29     File comparison utilities
ii  grep                          2.4.2-3    GNU grep, egrep and fgrep.
ii  make                          3.79.1-14  The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  patch                         2.5.4-11   Apply a diff file to an original
ii  stat                          3.3-2      wrapper for stat() and statfs call


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 149795-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was
unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and
useless.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to