Your message dated Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:44:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in new version/Uploaders mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2002 21:37:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 20 16:37:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.interware.hu [195.70.32.130]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17hGgj-00052c-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:37:21 -0500
Received: from victoria-176.budapest.interware.hu ([195.70.50.176]
helo=iluvatar.ath.cx)
by mail.interware.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 17hGgh-0001aX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:37:20 +0200
Received: by iluvatar.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1004)
id 03E9FABAE2; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:38:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libconfigreader-perl: binary-arch Vs Architecture: all
X-Marvin: Life, loathe it or ignore it, you can't like it.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:38:33 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libconfigreader-perl
Severity: serious
Your package is fully Architecture: all, yet, it builds the .deb in
the binary-arch target. Since policy states that
`binary-arch' builds the binary packages which are specific to
a particular architecture, and `binary-indep' builds those
which are not.
I consider this a policy violation, therefore a serious bug.
(Hint: one shouldn't follow the dh_make template blindly. A little
thought is always a good thing.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 157467-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2004 00:44:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 17 16:44:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gandalf.marclanger.de (mail.priggish.de) [195.60.111.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ai13I-0003bK-00; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:44:32 -0800
Received: from p213.54.119.12.tisdip.tiscali.de ([213.54.119.12] helo=Asfaloth)
by mail.priggish.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1Ai13G-00010U-9X; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:44:30 +0100
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=Asfaloth ident=identistdoof)
by Asfaloth with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ai13e-0004MN-00; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:44:54 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in new version/Uploaders mess
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:44:54 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
Sorry for the mess, the Uploaders field was not correct, so this upload
seemed to be a NMU.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
