Your message dated Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:29:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed in hwtools
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2001 13:51:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11 08:51:41 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-254-47.36-151.net24.it (borsa.endurance.loc)
[::ffff:151.36.47.254]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15KKOy-0005pp-00; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:51:40 -0500
Received: by borsa.endurance.loc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9B68B10F351; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ugly message in debconf
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:51:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: hwtools
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-11
Severity: minor
In testing hwtools' debconf menu with slang frontend I have (roughly):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuring Hwtools
hwtools package: < Save Note >
< Next > < Back > < Hide Help >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
You will most probably want to read
/usr/share/doc/hwtools/README.Debian and the rest of the files in that
directory, before using any of the programs included in this package.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The string "hwtools package" is actually really ugly. It would be better to
have something at least meaningful, like "hwtools package requires manual
configuration" or something like that.
Bye, Enrico
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux borsa 2.4.3 #1 Thu Apr 12 10:25:18 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 104299-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2004 14:29:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 13 07:29:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.202.12]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BDOvG-0004Fo-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:29:58 -0700
Received: (qmail 29637 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 14:28:42 -0000
Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.202.58)
by hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with QMQP; 13 Apr 2004 14:28:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:29:51 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Already fixed in hwtools
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
These bugs are already fixed in the hwtools package in unstable.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
