Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 11:01:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#93133: Licq vs everybuddy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2001 15:40:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 06 10:40:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (natura.oskuro.net) [213.96.69.115]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lYLV-0000Ez-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 10:40:21 -0500
Received: by natura.oskuro.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CF04227CF4; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:39:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: licq doesn't like everybuddy or viceversa
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 17:39:56 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: licq-ssl
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: normal
More info:
everybuddy-version: 0.2.0
When I message someone in my contact list and don't use "send through
server", he gets my message twice. Licq 1.0.3 tries to send direct,
thinks it can't (but the msg got there) and resends through server.
I don't know if this a problem with licq or everybuddy, so submitting
against my client first.
If there's some way I can provide more information, please tell me.
Thanks,
Jordi
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux natura 2.4.3 #2 Sun Apr 1 01:14:04 CEST 2001 i586
Versions of packages licq-ssl depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libssl0.9.6 [libssl096] 0.9.6-2 SSL shared libraries
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.3-10 The GNU stdc++ library
ii licq-plugin-console [licq-pl 1.0.3-2 Text front-end plugin for LICQ
ii licq-plugin-gtk+ [licq-plugi 0.50.1-3 Graphical front-end plugin for LIC
ii licq-plugin-qt2 1.0.3-2 Graphical front-end plugin for LIC
ii licq-plugin-qt2 [licq-plugin 1.0.3-2 Graphical front-end plugin for LIC
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 93133-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 09:02:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 02:02:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 115.red-213-96-69.pooles.rima-tde.net (natura.oskuro.net)
[213.96.69.115]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTdFd-0004O4-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 02:02:05 -0700
Received: from nubol.int.oskuro.net (nubol.int.oskuro.net [192.168.1.3])
by natura.oskuro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 25BF82787D; Fri, 28 May 2004 11:01:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nubol.int.oskuro.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C8A5E70C6BF; Fri, 28 May 2004 11:01:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 11:01:31 +0200
From: Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#93133: Licq vs everybuddy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: SinDominio
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux sid (Linux 2.6.3 i686)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:00:29AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If this bug still applies, please provide some way to reproduce it. Sinc=
e=20
> everybuddy has disappeared from sarge, I assume this combination is no lo=
nger=20
> in use and will delete this bug after a waiting period.
Yeah, given that everybuddy is dead and the IRC protocol has changed at
least twice since I filed the bug, besides I only use Jabber now, I
guess it's time to close this bug.
Thanks,
Jordi
--=20
Jordi Mallach P=E9rez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAtv/rJYSUupF6Il4RAvHvAJ9TsTW53Al5Nfkl0LmOiTIdAnvFvACgh9xL
YSmddo8szc0f9v43NfpLUGg=
=cAxq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--
