Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:26:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line obsolete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2001 17:16:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 04 11:16:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sr2.terra.com.br [200.176.3.17] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16BJBF-000720-00; Tue, 04 Dec 2001 11:16:29 -0600
Received: from smtp4-poa.terra.com.br (smtp4-poa.terra.com.br [200.176.3.35])
        by sr2.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45029FA29A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  4 Dec 2001 15:16:28 -0200 (GMT+2)
Received: from zaz.com.br (dl-nas1-C8C0B94F.bhz.terra.com.br [200.192.185.79])
        by smtp4-poa.terra.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A31DAC717
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  4 Dec 2001 15:16:27 -0200 (GMT+2)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:17:29 -0200
From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bug Trackin System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debconf reconfiguration doesn't work
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian-BR
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5claws46 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux SID
X-Face: BUFAba1BC<T<>{/6^&XIbU0Ja-yvA>@_Aq,6x\\v4P|cLoc|[OA)cTjqB4<l3e_~P<1"De[ 
V9(^p$M9?\H#o13H!u&Ql-@@tc\6CtR`qw~-JLOW}vR^|t6EKEb.7JcLW1)#(/d(psSss+.StN-7j& 
!,6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: hwtools
Version: 0.7-1

Hello,

dpkg-reconfigure hwtools doesn't work the way it is expected
to work: it should re-ask the questions it has done in
the first time it was installed

thanks

-- 
    Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov <http://www.metainfo.org/kov>
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+
|  .''`.  | Debian GNU/Linux: <http://www.debian.org>         |
| : :'  : + Debian BR.......: <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>+
| `. `'`  + Q: "Why did the chicken cross the road?"          +
|   `-    | A: "Upstream's decision." -- hmh                  |
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 122421-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 01:27:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 17 18:27:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Bb8A3-0005yh-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:27:19 -0700
Received: from pd9530a24.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.10.36] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
        by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1)
        id 1Bb8A2-0006aL-AS
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:27:18 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Bb89T-0001AS-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:26:43 +0200
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:26:42 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: obsolete
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Since there are no debconf notes left that make sense outside of
an update, this bug makes no sense anymore.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply via email to