Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:13:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old and rotten bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 11:38:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 05 04:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BsgVI-0004xD-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 04:33:48 -0700
Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35] ident=smurf)
by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BsgRL-00051n-TP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:29:44 +0200
Received: by kiste.smurf.noris.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 5 Aug 2004
13:29:43 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:29:43 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead of gcrypt7/gnutls10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Smurf-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead of gcrypt7/gnutls10
Package: cryptofs
Severity: important
'lufs-cryptofs' depends on gcrypt7 or gnutls10.
These packages are no longer supported by Upstream and contain serious
deficiencies / bugs which may turn out to be a security problem.
See [0] and followup emails, and [1] for further details.
Therefore, we want to get rid of gcrypt7 and gnutls10 in Sarge.
gcrypt11 and gnutls11 have an upwards-compatible API; in most cases you
only have to update your debian/control file.
Please upload a fixed version soon. Thank you.
NB: I plan to do NMUs (on 2004-08-15) for any packages which haven't
been updated at that time.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00075.html
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/258975
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263654-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 22:00:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 15:00:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4QXJ-0006Pe-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:00:57 -0700
Received: from debian.localnet (tortellini.unix-ag.uni-kl.de [131.246.89.3])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7EM0sNF031281
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:00:55 +0200
Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E4M2e-0005tR-Dw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:13:00 +0200
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:13:00 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing old and rotten bug report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 131105
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
