On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > > >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you > > >> disagree, > > >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > > >> > > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. > > But not in the affected binary package. > Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with > maintainer QA) version. > > FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package.
I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. So I would go for removing it from testing. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
