Package: auto-apt Version: 0.3.22 Severity: normal Hi,
having a build dependency recommendation is an useful feature, however I'd rather not use debuild to drive the build process, but dpkg-buildpackage. Would it make sense to switch here? Simon -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages auto-apt depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib Versions of packages auto-apt recommends: ii apt 0.8.5 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii devscripts 2.10.68 scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.15.8.5 Debian package development tools ii perl 5.10.1-14 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii sudo 1.7.4p4-3 Provide limited super user privile ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages auto-apt suggests: ii build-essential 11.5 Informational list of build-essent pn libgtk-perl <none> (no description available) ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 261-1 X terminal emulator -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100924102801.19912.11518.report...@richter
