* Bastian Blank [2010-12-08 10:37 +0100]: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > > #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user > > security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking. > > Could you explain why it should be acceptable to announce secure > operation but ignore the very basic principles of it? #564690 is an old > example of the same problem.
Could you explain how an example of a bug with a severity set by yourself supports your point, considering that the maintainer of this package only agreed about the bugs severity because it was a regression? Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101208110035.ga22...@furrball.stateful.de