On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 19:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 21:38:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > It's probably worth a mention in the release notes though. If anyone > > looking at this bug could propose some wording for this, that would be > > appreciated :) > > > Initial attempt below, comments welcome. [...] > +Certain berkeley db version 7 files created with libdb3 can't be read by > newer
s/Certain/Some/ ? I'm not sure if the RN has a policy on contractions but "cannot" might be clearer for translators. I suspect we also want "Berkeley Database". > +libdb versions. (see <ulink url="&url-bts;521860">bug#521860</ulink>). > +As a workaround, the files can be recreated with > <command>db4.8_load</command>. Worth mentioning db4.8-util here? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1293737937.3190.390.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
