Hey Daniel, feel free to take over the qpid* packages. I guess maintaining is getting easier now since upstream started to address some of the issues I opened.
For myself I can't do anything on the packages in the moment. Maybe I'll be back in some time, but it would be good idea to have some kind of team to manage qpid. So - you're wellcome. Cheers, Cajus Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2014, 22:10 +0200 schrieb Daniel Pocock: > > > Hi Cajus, > > I understand you retired from Debian but you are are still registered > maintainer for qpid-tools[1] and qpid-cpp[2] and you have previously > upload qpid-python but it appears to be orphaned[3] now. > > Darryl (on CC) has recently uploaded qpid-proton to > mentors.debian.net[4] - I may be able to sponsor this because it is > needed for the next OpenMAMA upload. > > Darryl, as you work through the lintian errors, you may be able to get > some ideas from looking at the other qpid packages, contents of their > debian directories[4] > > I was thinking about whether this should go to a pkg-qpid group or just > collab-maint in alioth - Cajus, did you get any expressions of interest > from anybody else for maintaining these packages? If so I would try and > get some co-ordination around them and maybe a page on wiki.debian.org > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qpid-tools.html > 2. http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qpid-cpp.html > 3. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729207 > 4. http://mentors.debian.net/package/qpid-proton > 5. https://github.com/cajus/qpid-cpp-debian > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1399444009.3385.16.ca...@statler.muc.intranet.gonicus.de