Kenneth Pronovici dixit: >I'm not trying to be snarky here, but I'm a little lost. This package >is orphaned. If you're no longer the package maintainer, why should >it even matter to you whether upstream issues are tracked as Debian >bugs?
Because ① I’m upstream, ② I’m maintaining this package in Debian, and, most importantly, ③ feature requests aren’t bugs, period. >Besides that, this is arguably a functional regression vs. older >versions of pdksh in Debian, which mksh now provides. I think it's >useful to have the change in behavior noted, even if it is only a >wishlist. That’s arguably a good point. One of mksh’s biggest strengths is that it behaves consistently across all platforms, though. DO NOT break that. Goodnight, //mirabilos -- <igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. <igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. <igli> it's like anti-design. <mirabilos> that too… may I quote you on that? <igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1505012316540.6...@herc.mirbsd.org
