Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:35:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed bugs for pam source
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 1997 08:19:25 +0000
Received: (qmail 20157 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1997 08:19:24 -0000
Received: from chunks.gag.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 1997 08:19:23 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by chunks.gag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA12212
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 02:19:20 -0600
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 02:19:20 -0600
From: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libpam0 postinst problem
Package: libpam0
Version: 0.56-2
Setting up libpam0 (0.56-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam0.postinst: [: ==: binary operator expected
This happened during an upgrade from 1.2 with some additions to 1.3.
Bdale
