Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't
updated package ages recently
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 07:42:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 01:42:46 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us (mail.omsoft.com) [168.150.193.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18IlE6-0000O6-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:42:46 -0600
Received: from kabloom.dnsalias.com (dcn239-7.dcn.davis.ca.us [168.150.239.7])
by mail.omsoft.com (8.11.4/8.11.4/Omsoft) with ESMTP id gB27ghm19141;
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bloom by kabloom.dnsalias.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18Il9G-000106-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 23:37:46 -0800
From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages
recently
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 23:37:46 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-01
Severity: important
The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to
have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status"
field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed
satie.debian.org.
Here is the relevant portion of lynx -dump performed on the glibc page
on packages.qa.debian.org
Testing Status
Too young, only 0 of 10 days old
locales/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/arm unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/mips unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
locales/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5
[174]libc6-dbg (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc)
is buggy! (1 > 0)
[175]libc6 (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is
buggy! (8 > 1)
[176]libc6-sparc64 (sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1)
[177]glibc (source) is buggy! (1 > 0)
Not considered
Latest News
[2002-11-19] [178]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-5 (i386 source all)
[2002-11-18] [179]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-4 (i386 source all)
[2002-10-21] [180]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-3 (i386 source all)
[2002-10-20] [181]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-2 (i386 source all)
.
.
.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kabloom.dnsalias.com 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST
2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171405-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 11:51:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 05:51:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Ip73-0000Jd-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 05:51:46 -0600
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0141721E44; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated
package ages recently
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.7 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Le Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert écrivait:
> Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to
> > have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status"
> > field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed
> > satie.debian.org.
>
> Testing scripts are disabled -> no updates.
Exactly, that's why you could have closed the bug yourself ... :)
(I'm closing it with this mail)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
