Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255920: packages.qa.debian.org: package names should be
URL-encoded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2004 19:23:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 23 12:23:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dolphin.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp [157.82.41.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BdDKm-00047V-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:23:00 -0700
Received: from saba.dol (saba.dol [192.168.1.2])
by dolphin.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2766827EF5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:22:29 +0900 (JST)
Received: by saba.dol (Postfix, from userid 11017)
id B7B3F1FD02; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:22:28 +0900 (JST)
From: Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.qa.debian.org: package names should be URL-encoded
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:22:28 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-06-24
Severity: normal
Some links are broken in the overview page for the gtk+2.0 source package
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html) because "gtk+2.0" is used
directly as a part of URL in those links.
"+" should be URL-encoded as "%2B".
[Examples]
* In the "Problems" box, I see a message as follows;
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 5-day delay
is over.
Check why.
^^^^^^^^^-> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gtk+2.0
When I visit this URL, I see an error message like this;
Checking gtk 2.0
* gtk 2.0 is not a debian package
So I access http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gtk%2B2.0
and I can see an expected message;
Checking gtk+2.0
* trying to update gtk+2.0 from 2.4.2-1 to 2.4.3-1 (candidate is 5 days old)
* gtk+2.0 is going in today
* In the "Other links" box, I can find links;
Debcheck on unstable
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^->
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=gtk+2.0
Debcheck on testing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^->
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=gtk+2.0
When I visit these URLs, I see an error message;
wrong chars in variable.
So I access http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=gtk%2B2.0
and http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=gtk%2B2.0
and I can see expected pages.
Other following links to CGI scripts work correctly;
* http://bugs.debian.org/src:gtk+2.0 in the "Bugs Count" box.
* http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gtk+2.0 in the "Other Links" box.
However, I made sure they also work when "+" is encoded as "%2B".
So, they should be encoded likewise.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux saba 2.4.23 #1 2003ǯ 12·î 8Æü ·îÍËÆü 21:59:39 JST i686
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255920-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2004 18:44:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 11:44:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BeedP-0007bk-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:44:12 -0700
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 40B89EB435; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:41 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#255920: packages.qa.debian.org: package names should be
URL-encoded
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Quoting Kobayashi Noritada:
> I tried to write a template to URL-encode (or URL-escape) a given packa=
ge name,
> and found that function already added to this XSL file in r1.16 on 2003=
-03-13.
> (It was just the same as what I intended to write.)
Duh, you're right, I had forgotten about it. :-)=20
> Since I don't have XML files to be transformed with this XSL file,
> and I don't know the data structure of those files,
> I can't test whether this XSL file can transform correctly.
> I hope it would work.
I hope too, I applied it without testing locally (no time for that),
we'll quickly see if it works ;-)
But your change looked fine for me.
Cheers,
--=20
Rapha=EBl Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Earn money with free software: http://www.geniustrader.org
