On Tue, March 6, 2007 09:34, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > great, are these results published somewhere? Trivial obsoleted conflicts > might > be removed via a wishlist bug.
No actual result at the moment. I was playing with something not really related and noticed the impressive number on conflicts in the distribution, with many easily identifiable as very old packages. I just preferred asking if it was worth looking at it a bit further. Not sure about the wishlist bug though. That would be proper mass filing, and I would like to know how big the thing is first. >> Shouldn't there be some sort of best practice or recommandation >> somewhere about cleaning this field when it becomes useless ? > > indeed, it might make sense to keep conflicts from oldstable, but not > before or > in special cases as pointed out by Bart. No problem about that. >> Any comment to tell me whether I got it wrong or not is welcome :) >> >> Regis >> >> PS : I'm not (yet ?) subscribed to the list, please CC me. > > don't worry, this is a low-traffic ML :) I note that :) Regis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
