On 04/08/07 at 12:52 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > Lucas does some magic with his ruby scripts to merge old logs with new ones > > and > > does so mark new failures with NEWFAIL etc.. im not sure if they would work > > with > > your list, .. if you want to run this check on a regular basis this is > > something > > we should look into. > > Sure I can run periodically, once in two weeks sounds ok? > I'll investigate NEWFAIL stuff as well.
Hi, Really nice work :-) Regarding the list format, you got it right. You don't need to add a fake build time: when needed, I'll change mergeresults.rb so that it works even with a different number of fields (I wanted to do that for piuparts results anyway). Don't hesitate to ping me when you need it. About running it periodically, I'm not sure that you need to run it so often. The test is similar to piuparts, and piuparts results tend to be quite stable. The best thing to do would probably be to integrate that into piuparts, so archive-wide piuparts runs would include your test as well. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
