On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Let me see if I got it right: > You filed a bug against karchiver because it: > * is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch), > * is orphaned (...); and because > * it has a "low" popcon (283/86 inst/vote; for a package that has never been > in stable) > And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped > in lenny? Is that right?
Yes. I really don't think orphaned packages should be newly introduced in stable releases if not necessary. > IMHO there are many other packages that are better candidates for not being > shipped in lenny than the above mentioned example. Indeed, and I do not intend for this to be my last list of such packages. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
